electionscount.info

electionscount.info › Analysis › Falsification methods

Ballot Stuffing: The Traces It Leaves in Election Numbers

Extra ballots in a box are hard to hide, because they have to match signatures, envelopes and turnout. Each way of hiding them leaves its own trace.

Original page on electionscount.info: Distribution of votes by polling station depending on turnout, 2015

Ballot stuffing means putting more ballots into the box than there were real voters. It sounds crude, but it can be done in several ways, and each one needs the help of the commission to keep the numbers consistent. That is exactly why it can be found.

Four ways to stuff a box, and what each leaves behind

How it is doneWhat it needsTrace in the numbers
Ballots dropped in before voting startsAgreement between organizers and observersMore ballots in the box than signatures
Envelopes added little by little during the dayThe same number of fake signatures in the listTurnout above the station's hourly capacity
Voter lists signed in advance, using old lists, and swapped after votingAccess to lists and signaturesSignatures of people who were absent or abroad
Ballots thrown in during a fight or chaosA staged disorder at the stationMismatch of ballots, envelopes and signatures

The book stresses one point about capacity: no polling station can serve more than a certain number of people per hour. If the number of voters and ballots in an hour is above that limit, signatures and ballots were most likely forged. See how polling station capacity is calculated.

Signs seen in Armenian elections

The "carousel"

When a box holds more envelopes than ballots, some voters probably carried their blank ballot out. This points to the "carousel": a voter receives an already marked ballot outside, drops it in, and brings out the empty one for the next person. Bribed or pressured voters make it work. The numbers cannot prove who did it, but they show where the media and law enforcement should look.

How big it was in 2015

614polling stations with mismatched electoral numbers
931,092registered voters at those stations
~250of them with turnout above 70%
82%YES among participants at those ~250 stations

At stations with proper public oversight, turnout was lower and votes were split differently than at stations without it. That difference is in itself a measure of what oversight prevents.

What stops it

The book's proposals are practical: publish turnout often during the day, publish signatures and ballot counts right after polls close and before counting starts, and declare the result of a station invalid when its numbers do not match. Each step makes the fake numbers harder to keep in line.

From the book

This article is based on Chapters IV and V of Electoral Rights and Election Falsification by Lyudvig Khachatryan, which explains the full method, the formulas and the cases behind it.

Read the book on Amazon

Related analysis