electionscount.info

electionscount.info › Analysis › 2012 parliamentary elections

Armenia 2012: Talin, Orgov, Agarakavan and Akunk, Five Polling Stations Where Turnout Was Rewritten

Orgov reported 768 voters for a list of 390; a Talin station went from 665 to 10 to 1,028. Five stations in one area account for almost half of all 2012 decreases.

Original page on electionscount.info: “Negative” participation, 2012

On 6 May 2012 the official turnout of these polling stations went down between two reports, which cannot happen in a real count: each report includes everyone who voted since 8:00. The monitoring site drew a chart for each such station from the turnout published by elections.am. They are among the 20 stations with "negative" participation in 2012.

How to read these charts

The chart has three panels, all for the same polling station and the same four reporting times (11:00, 14:00, 17:00, 20:00):

Station 15/28, Orgov

School building. Registered voters: 390.

Three charts of polling station 15/28 in Orgov, 2012: seconds per voter, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout against 390 registered voters.
Polling station 15/28, Orgov: speed, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout, 6 May 2012. Open the original list.

How to read this chart

Left: seconds per voter in each 3-hour window. Middle: voters in each window (below the red line = a decrease). Right: reported turnout (blue) against the 390 registered voters (purple).

What it shows

The most impossible numbers of the 20. The station had 390 registered voters, yet the 17:00 report said 768 had voted, almost twice as many people as were on the list, after 532 votes in three hours (one every 20 seconds). The final count was 300: 468 fewer than at 17:00.

WindowReported turnout at the endVoters in the windowSeconds per voter
8:00–11:00100100108.0
11:00–14:0023613679.4
14:00–17:0076853220.3
17:00–20:00300-468—

Station 15/29, Talin

Sports school building. Registered voters: 1,857.

Three charts of polling station 15/29 in Talin, 2012: seconds per voter, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout against 1,857 registered voters.
Polling station 15/29, Talin: speed, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout, 6 May 2012. Open the original list.

How to read this chart

Left: seconds per voter in each 3-hour window. Middle: voters in each window (below the red line = a decrease). Right: reported turnout (blue) against the 1,857 registered voters (purple).

What it shows

At 14:00 the count was 700; at 17:00 it was 277, 423 fewer; at 20:00 it was 1,213. That means 936 people voted in the last three hours, one every 11.5 seconds. No polling station can register voters that fast.

WindowReported turnout at the endVoters in the windowSeconds per voter
8:00–11:0030030036.0
11:00–14:0070040027.0
14:00–17:00277-423—
17:00–20:001,21393611.5

Station 15/30, Talin

House of Culture building. Registered voters: 1,606.

Three charts of polling station 15/30 in Talin, 2012: seconds per voter, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout against 1,606 registered voters.
Polling station 15/30, Talin: speed, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout, 6 May 2012. Open the original list.

How to read this chart

Left: seconds per voter in each 3-hour window. Middle: voters in each window (below the red line = a decrease). Right: reported turnout (blue) against the 1,606 registered voters (purple).

What it shows

At 14:00, 665 people had voted. The 17:00 report said 10. In the last three hours the count then rose by 1,018 to 1,028, one voter every 10.6 seconds, the fastest of all 20 stations apart from Achajur.

WindowReported turnout at the endVoters in the windowSeconds per voter
8:00–11:0024724743.7
11:00–14:0066541825.8
14:00–17:0010-655—
17:00–20:001,0281,01810.6

Station 15/32, Agarakavan

School building. Registered voters: 761.

Three charts of polling station 15/32 in Agarakavan, 2012: seconds per voter, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout against 761 registered voters.
Polling station 15/32, Agarakavan: speed, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout, 6 May 2012. Open the original list.

How to read this chart

Left: seconds per voter in each 3-hour window. Middle: voters in each window (below the red line = a decrease). Right: reported turnout (blue) against the 761 registered voters (purple).

What it shows

The station had 761 voters. At 17:00 the report said 985 had voted, more than the whole list, after 635 votes in three hours. The final count was 593: 392 fewer than at 17:00.

WindowReported turnout at the endVoters in the windowSeconds per voter
8:00–11:0016216266.7
11:00–14:0035018857.5
14:00–17:0098563517.0
17:00–20:00593-392—

Station 15/33, Akunk (Aragats)

House of Culture building. Registered voters: 548.

Three charts of polling station 15/33 in Akunk (Aragats), 2012: seconds per voter, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout against 548 registered voters.
Polling station 15/33, Akunk (Aragats): speed, voters per 3 hours and cumulative turnout, 6 May 2012. Open the original list.

How to read this chart

Left: seconds per voter in each 3-hour window. Middle: voters in each window (below the red line = a decrease). Right: reported turnout (blue) against the 548 registered voters (purple).

What it shows

Turnout rose to 535 at 17:00, almost the whole list of 548, then the final count was 390, 145 fewer.

WindowReported turnout at the endVoters in the windowSeconds per voter
8:00–11:009494114.9
11:00–14:0026417063.5
14:00–17:0053527139.9
17:00–20:00390-145—

Why it matters

A report that falls means that at least one of the station's official numbers is false: either voters were announced who had not come, or the final protocol was cut back. When the fall is followed by hundreds of votes at a speed of 10–20 seconds per voter, or when a report exceeds the number of registered voters, the numbers point to signatures and ballots added on paper. See polling station capacity and the method of comparing election numbers.

From the book

This article is based on Chapters IV and VI of Electoral Rights and Election Falsification by Lyudvig Khachatryan, which explains the full method, the formulas and the cases behind it.

Read the book on Amazon

Related analysis